Catherine Shieh
  • Home
  • About
    • Official Bio
    • Blog, aka Ramblings
  • Services
  • Portfolio
    • Projects
    • Class Observations
  • Let's Talk

Here's my blog.
​I talk a lot about education, race, and ethnic studies... right here.
​Down below.

what does knowing different languages mean anyways?

2/23/2024

0 Comments

 
i've always felt so profoundly weird about languages. there's really the typical stuff that are more normalized than when i was growing up:
  • don't ask someone "say something in X language!" like we are zoo animals and for your entertainment. i already feel like a jester to perform in white-cultured normative groups and audiences anyways.
  • there are many ways to be bilingual and you can fill it out in job forms - written, speaking/verbal, listening comprehension (yay capitalism?)
  • i've talked about the need to unpack the "usefulness of language". many people now generally understand why i am bothered when the comment passes by... "it's so cool you know chinese, it's useful". gotta be critical of the racial hierarchy.
  • i've talked to a lot of people why i don't love the idea of being called bilingual or multilingual - i can talk to you in environmental policy in english! i promise! but i really can't do that in my first language, mandarin. does that make me less of a mandarin speaker? how does that dismiss my complexity of identity housed in languages? 

however...
a new lightbulb about language went off in my head about a month ago. i went to get coffee with someone in downtown (the loop for my chicago friends) chicago, in which i communicated to a migrant family in spanish. 

they seemed profoundly grateful not only of the items i gave, but really of the language ability. at this point, multiple migrants that i have interacted with have mentioned i'm the only person that has talked to them in spanish all day.

let's be really clear - i am not fluent in spanish by any means. 

i also realize the idea of fluency is not only topic based (example above - i can't talk about environmental policy in chinese but i can definitely help you at a restaurant or talk to my dad) BUT ALSO the concept of fluency is really geographically based. maybe you knew this but i definitely DID NOT. 

i realized - in chicago, i am a lot less ashamed of what spanish and chinese i can and can't say. back in los angeles? my spanish is embarassing. back in the bay area? my chinese is something people have explicitly laughed at. but in chicago, i feel like i have some budding superpowers i've never truly felt before.

so if my confidence is so contexual, what does being multilingual even mean for anyone?
0 Comments

Conflicted about my Black/White thinking

9/21/2021

0 Comments

 
There have been a ton of descriptors about who I am. I'm not hard to figure out, my personality shows pretty quickly. I'm oftentimes described as passionate, intense, intimidating (at first), and authoritative. It makes me cringe.

I rarely consider these words as words with positive connotations, especially as a woman. As an Asian American woman, sometimes it feels that people are surprised I have a personality. If you didn't know, Asian American women being labeled as docile and submissive is a whole thing.

I've also been described as a person who has black and white thinking. It's also known as binary thinking, dichotomous thinking, etc. Funny enough, I talk about the dangers of not thinking in a spectrum, while fully acknowledging that I.. struggle to think in a spectrum.

So what is black and white thinking? I think in terms of absolutes, and quickly more often than not. People who struggle with black and white thinking are seen as people who struggle with change, can be temperamental, and sometimes even deny that life is complex and uncertain. 

Yikes. None of this sounds good. My god, it's even on WebMD. And I'm a part of all this?!

My therapist also told me that my black and white thinking is associated with moral grounding... and I am starting to feel relieved. More relieved than I have felt in all of this pandemic so far. I'm also a pretty sensitive person, I wear emotions on my face, I am just generally emotive and my heartstrings get pulled easily. Anyways, I'm not trying to promote black and white thinking, but hear me out for a second here. I really do think of virtually everything in terms of morals.
  • I do think that when/how you ghost someone says something about your ability to tackle conflict.
  • I do think that how you treat children says something about your ability to see all people with dignity.
  • I do think that someone wanting to be in a "safe neighborhood" says a lot about views about race, gender, etc. 
  • What you choose to do or not do says a lot about the way you think, and where your moral compass lies.
and the list keeps going.

I want to acknowledge there's a lot of nuance here. Feeling safe has a lot to do with identity, exposure, experiences, etc. Being able to tackle conflict might have a lot to do with being in a stable or unstable home life growing up. But I do personally have a lot of clarity about why I am the way I am. I care about having good people in the world, I crave care and connection, and I don't want to feel like I get caught in a lie when I get to know people. So then I judge and think in black/white terms. 

I don't really know what it means to "fix this" or "fix myself", but I do feel a lot of relief in having clarity. I really do want people (and myself) to have strong moral grounding. And I'm allowed, at least to some degree, to believe that what we say, do, or not do/say says something deeper about all of us.


0 Comments

Do you know me? Do you care to know me?

8/15/2020

0 Comments

 
I don’t actually mean me, me. I mean my race. My ethnicity. My intersectionality of identities. Actually, it’s not really just me i’m talking about - it’s people like me. People who look like me. People a part of my “box” on the 2020 census.

This post is for my non-asian friends who consider themselves dedicated to social justice, etc.

So far, I feel so fortunate to have curated my social circle to really only be amongst people who agree with me (i’m not moderate, i don’t care to be moderate, and i don’t think my job is to change my friends’ minds, especially since it’s been my full time job To change people’s minds for 5+ years. changing friends and having politically diverse friends can be for others, it’s just not for me - at least for right now. As James Baldwin says, ‘we can agree and still love each other unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist’. So far i see most people who disagree with me as folx who are rooted in the denial of someone’s right to exist/survive/thrive). So far it’s been great. We agree on a lot of stuff - current affairs, social issues, we listen to each other in genuine ways, we align politically, etc. it works. 

But i’m also noticing something strange as hell.

when i talk about asian american/aanhpi issues, i see blank faces amongst my friends. There are no questions. No nods. Just listening. When I talk about asian american identity, same reaction. 

My suspicion/question: do my friends not know about AANHPI issues? Why don’t they? Why don’t you? Is this even a conversation?

More examples with blank face reactions:
  • one of my closest friends didn’t know about the book “minor feelings” by cathy park hong.
  • several of my closest friends have never heard of the organization i Currently work for.
  • One of my friends learned for the first time that language access is one of the primary issues for AANHPI folx. Note that i used the word primary.
  • *not that these are larger indicators of anything, but simply examples*   

There’s a sense of shock, a sense of betrayal, like when they look at me in a photo my friends don’t see anyone or anything There. As i’ve transitioned out of teaching, this has felt all the more obvious to me. I now work for a civil rights organization, asian americans advancing justice (Aaaj) -  and it is near and dear to my heart. Not only is it kind of like the naacp for asian americans (which is how i describe it when people ask me what the organization is about), but for many asian americans who have their identity/social justice reckoning, This is one of the first organizations they are exposed to/hear of. For me? I learned about Aaaj When i was 16. In an asian american studies class. Learning about aaaj sparked a few REVELATIONS for me:
1. There are people who look like me that care about actual issues
2. This means i could make “caring about actual issues”.. an actual career/job
3. Model minority stereotype is truly a myth. The existence of this org. Proves that
4. It is very possible and likely that those who major and study ethnic studies will never take an asian american studies class. They’ll study other racial communities, though. 
5. Learning about aaaj is synonymous with learning about asian american studies. You can’t know one without knowing the other.
6. Aaaj and all its affiliates will be important to me for the rest of my life.

The people i know in social justice orgs, in teaching, in ethnic studies organizing committees, and in community groups have no shortage of suggestions of books to read, groups to join, people to know, and worksheets/graphics/posts to share. And i love this. I love this about the education/teaching community. But not knowing AAAJ? Having a blank face when i talk about aaaj? I am hurt. I am shocked. I take a step back. 

Now, This blank face reaction kind of makes me panic. Because There’s no blank face with conversations about black lives matter. Because There’s nodding with every critical conversation to be had. But conversations about people who look like me? There’s nothing. No reaction. No thoughts. No reflection. No criticality. No admittance. It’s not Even a blank canvas. It’s not an empty wall. I see a face that didn’t know there needed to be a canvas, that needed a wall that could use some decorating to begin with. 


THESE EXCHANGES MAKE ME FEEL ASHAMED AND I DO know why. It makes me feel like i don’t matter. My people don’t matter. My community doesn’t matter. Maybe i should stop complaining. Maybe i should stop believing that the state of asian america is kinda bad. Maybe i should stop trying to move my own people. Maybe this is a lost cause. Maybe i am a lost cause. Maybe aanhpis aren’t people of color after all. The shame = the gaslighting.

THESE EXCHANGES MAKE ME FEEL BETRAYED AND I ​DO KNOW WHY. I FEEL BETRAYED BECAUSE IT DIDN’T OCCUR TO SOMEONE (MY OWN FRIEND) THAT MY LIFE, MY PEOPLE, WERE WORTH GETTING TO KNOW. WORTH STUDYING. WORTH EXAMINING. NOT LIKE SPECIMEN, BUT AS ancestors, as ACTUAL FLAWED AND POWERful PEOPLE AFFECTED BY SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS. MAYBE THAT WASN’T THE INTENT of the blank face reaction - BUT AS I USUALLY SAY, IF THE WORLD RAN ON GOOD INTENTIONS WE WOULD HAVE A MUCH BETTER WORLD BY NOW. The betrayal = i am worth nothing after all.

Maybe people are just processing, and this is what processing looks like for many folx. But what i do know, is that i’m also not having explicit and/or follow up conversations with these same folx about asian american identity or systemic issues that face aanhpi folx in this country. Am i, is my community, just a passing thought? Do people know that aanhpi invisibility (in history, studies, etc.) is a serious issue and their Blank face reaction is a contribution to that very issue? And if you think “other issues are more important”, i ask that you reflect on what you think is appropriate/timely, what makes you think your compassion and empathy is limited, and when will it be time for you to think about the aanhpi community as “people worth knowing”. Btw i’m not trying to say aanhpi issues matter more than the current civil unrest, the frequency of deaths in the black community, the amount of children in concentration camps in the latinx community, the amount of substance abuse and mental health issues in the multiracial community, the amount of human trafficking and missing indigenous folx in our country, (not to flatten the experiences of other racial communities with singular issues and only narratives of tragedy/oppression) etc. but what i am saying is, why don’t you know... any aanhpi issues at all? Why can’t we have an actual conversation about anything regarding my community? I’m not here to blame you. I’m asking you to own up to this. I’m asking to talk about this.

It makes me recall when I was at an ethnic studies conference this summer, in one of the sessionS we talked about mutual aid societies and how to build community during the time of the pandemic. I brought up the issue that places like koreatown and chinatown have multiple races and ethnicities... and multiple languages. My question was, “how do we bring people together when language access may be a challenge when we build community?” My question was quickly dismissed by the facilitator (yes, she was BIPOC), in which she stated, “well, we just start by putting everyone together”. The immediate reaction in my head was, “she has no idea how isolated aanhpi neighborhoods/communities are”. I’ve talked to political consultants, experienced canvassers, aanhpi advocacy groups alike - oftentimes it is a mystery and a challenge how to canvass successfully in anychinatown, USA. Let alone other aanhpi communities and enclaves. Let alone other actions/community building initiatives. I’m still a little salty from this interaction.

It makes me recall that all my aanhpi friends and colleagues who have talked to me about race have stated to me that they “don’t trust other people of color” to have these conversations, and “other people of color don’t understand/won’t validate my issues as actual issues”. It seems like all our conversations are secret. Behind closed doors - not because we’re trying to conspire, but because we’re afraid to be gaslighted by other people. After all, it’s kind of thing to debate whether or not aanhpi folx are people of color. 

It makes me recall that as i’ve talked to some of my friends about me possibly considering a phd and following somewhat in my spouse’s footsteps, i do talk about how there are very, very few asian american studies departments let alone asian american scholars i can be an advisee to. I get the sympathetic “oh...”, but no one bats an eye. It seems that people, people who call themselves allies, accomplices, and co-conspirators have no idea what it means to be erased in ways aanhpi folx feel erased all the time. I need you recognize my years of pain and feelings of invisibility and dismissal when i tell you i can’t find an aanhpi department or an aanhpi tenured scholar that fits my interests. I need you to recognize the systemic issue that there are an endless Amount reasons “why asian american studies DEPARTMENTS can’t/won’t exist”. That’s what i’m telling you, even if i can’t Or don’t explain it explicitly in the moment.

Thinking about this also reminds me - i’ve thought All this before. I’ve worried about this over th years. After taking my first asian american studies class at a local community college when i was 16 (note the privilege to be able to take a class like this!), i recall coming to the explicit conclusion that if i get to know other people and the racial communities they are a part of, they in turn will eventually want to get to know me and the “people i am a part of”. As i’ve learned more, i now realize this is called transactional (level 2) solidarity. It’s not... good or bad. It just is. 

However, at the same time There also was a small lingering doubt as i thought through this in my little teenage brain. The doubt whispered in my ear, “will anyone ever care to know your people? How much time will need to pass before people are interested, let alone invested In your people and ask you questions?”. 

Twelve years later, The doubt doesn’t whisper. Doubt just stares back at me materializing into the faces of people i love and admire. And it reminds me, maybe i am truly alone. 
0 Comments

i have doubts that "this moment" is one for the history books.

6/4/2020

1 Comment

 
Picturefor the record, i don't think this is going to happen.
 I took the liberty of looking at the 2019 AP US History exam. Here are the time periods I recorded that students had to write about in this exam:
  • 1607-1754
  • 1754-1776
  • 1765-1800
  • 1830-1865
  • 1883
  • 1890-1910
  • 1902
  • 1909
  • 1911
  • 1913
  • 1917
  • 1918
  • 1940s
  • 1940-1970
  • Notice a time period that's missing? Like the entirety of the past 50 years?
Spoiler alert: the tests don't change that drastically from year to year. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the skeptics, why don't we break this down. note the percentages in black. 1980s-present is 4-6% of the curriculum. 

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
I REMEMBER SPENDING A MINIMUM 4 MONTHS STUDYING THE ERAS FROM 1491 (ALSO WEIRD YEAR TO FLEX, COLUMBUS NEVER SET FOOT ON "AMERICAN SOIL") TO 1848. 2 MONTHS IN SUMMER, 2 MONTHS IN THE SCHOOL YEAR. THAT IS 1/5TH OF THE SCHOOL YEAR.

regular US history teachers aren't better. usually teachers have to teach more than 1 class - so the US history teacher and the AP US History teacher are the same person. as a coping mechanism (because the job is pretty much an impossible job), that teachers will teach regular US history similarly to APUSH, not the other way around. You have your reputation on the line, after all (shoutout to pass rates). One additional thing: There's also a recurring feedback loop - the easiest units to teach are the ones with more resources, the units with more resources are the Revolution, Civil War, WW2, aka anything pre-1970s, and the cycle continues.


This is all to say that I think this idea that "we will teach this in history and we will be appalled" is still wishful thinking. Demand that the tests change. Reallocate those percentages. Demand that the curriculum and standards change. Demand that course offerings change.
1 Comment

anger from a photograph + amy cooper.

6/3/2020

1 Comment

 
Some thoughts about the amy cooper/Christian cooper incident: yes. everything about this makes me mad. many people talked about it - white fragility, white women and the need to own up to their own racism, bad/lack of actual apologies, lack of justice, lack of clarity on what happens moving forward, etc. I collected a lot of articles/opinions about it. i love that there are so many nuanced voices coming forth. this is what also makes me mad: nothing is going to happen to amy cooper's mentality. white people who have been burned like her don't necessarily change their mind. actually, it's pretty unlikely.

post incident - Did amy donate to BLM? Did amy go enroll in a community college to take a sociology class? did amy go and actively examine that she's only friends with a particular set of race(s) and gender(s)?

anyways, a month ago i saw a photo of preschoolers from a school somewhere in west LA county. it was just a photo of smiling preschoolers. that's it. the preschoolers obviously didn't do anything to me. but seeing them triggered me, infuriated me, and i was deeply moody for days. I thought about these kids (that i don't know, mind you!), and i was just simply fuming and obsessing.over and over again. 

my friend (thanks, zack!) helped me realize this - i know why looking at photos of white people make me so upset: based on my research, life experiences, and statistics known, I think i know exactly how they are going to turn out. Sure, sure. not all white people are like this. but that's not the point of this post. Try this story out. I will produce the following assumptions in a story below:
  1. I know these preschoolers are in a white only area. the demographics of the town prove this.
  2. i know these preschoolers' friends are probably white. they are in the same school, same town.
  3. i know these preschoolers' parents are probably white. THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE TOWN PROVE THIS.
  4. i know these preschoolers' parents' friends are probably white. THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE TOWN PROVE THIS.
  5. White peoples' social networks on average are 91% white. this solidifies assumption #4. This has been studied (Credit: MTV Film - WHite people, jose antonio vargas)
  6. White people are the most segregated racial group (yes, they beat natives, who they physically put in reservations. yes, they beat bPOCs, who were redlined) in america. in fact, 77% of white people live in white only communities.
    1. don't tell me you live in a diverse area, largely because very few people actually do. even i live quite literally on the white side of the street in my own neighborhood, which is one of the most racially and socioeconomically diverse neighborhoods in the entire county. if i can talk about my life in segregation, you can too. calm down. it will be fine.
  7. This town is largely college educated. look up the local high school stats and you know where kids end up going. I know many will go to top 30 colleges/universities, which are majority white. i know many will benefit from legacy, which has proven to benefit white people. they will move from growing up in a white town and then moving to a white college and think that's what it means to "make it".
  8. these elite colleges generate types of people: mainly white collar industries, mainly industries with majority white people.
    1. do not even begin to tell me that tech is diverse. much of tech is in a majority asian american county, but most leadership is white and it has been researched. Tech is also REALLY good at not recruiting 1st gen. college goers, which excludes black and latinx folks. 
    2. There is segregation within that white college. I remember realizing this my junior year in college and feeling really gross.
    3. they may even join a frat, or sorority. that's the thing to do, right?
  9. They will then move into their white jobs: consulting, politics, law, maybe acting, or some other elite thing that we seem to value that upholds whiteness. now these preschoolers have moved from white preschool, white neighborhood, to white college, to white jobs. they have not known that they have been swimming in a sea of white. you notice you are in a sea of white the moment you are not in a sea of white, and this moment has yet to happen.
  10. they don't even realize they are choosing white neighborhoods. they are just choosing "safety", "what's good for their kids", "what is close to work", etc. there are so many reasons coded in race. i argue we haven't even scraped the tip of the iceberg on coded racism, but i'll save that for another post. 
  11. they're going to choose that white neighborhood. and they will make fun of people like me.
    1. i still feel pain from my 1st grade friend who didn't like that i spoke mandarin in front of her, only to find out 2 weeks later that speaking mandarin was banned at school.
    2. i still feel pain from 2nd grade, when my lunch wasn't as cool as other lunches (i lived in an asian am. city and still felt the lunchbox moment, mind you).
    3. i still remember telling my mom in 3rd grade that "we only speak english in this house now" and  telling her to "fix her accent" and criticizing her for not "trying hard enough". i'm not white, but i placed whiteness on her.
    4. i remember my high school teachers telling the whole class how bad our parents were. in fact, some of my white HS teachers now live in PREDOMINANTLY white towns once they had kids.
    5. i still remember my high school best friend telling me that sweet beans were weird and very much did not enjoy the chinese grocery store i once took her to. btw, she has since apologized and we are close friends. 
    6. i feel pain not because i'm wallowing in self pity. i feel pain because these white people have never known that they needed to apologize. and i may not ever get that apology. sorry means a lot to me.
    7. I am AANHPI. I have conditional whiteness. think of how it is for soooooo many non-white people for a hot second here.
    8. their kids will make fun of BIPOC kids. and they will not be shunned for doing so. they will continue to live their lives.
  12. They will feel racial tension - someone may call them out on social media, someone will tell them not to say that microaggression, maybe something inappropriate happened at work, etc. but nothing will happen. they won't change the way they raised their kids. they won't move out of their white only neighborhood. they won't fight for equal and transparent pay. they won't donate to a cause immediately post-microaggression. white fragility ensues. their kids see that white fragility and imitate it. they continue to live their lives.
  13. ​THE IRONY OF ALL OF THIS? THESE WHITE KIDS MAKING FUN OF MY FOOD back IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ARE THE SAME DEMOGRAPHIC OF WHITE PEOPLE THAT NOW PAY $17 FOR MY PEOPLE'S GARLIC BEAN SPROUTS. I GO INTO TAIWANESE RESTAURANTS now AND BLACK OUT FOR A MOMENT FROM UNRESOLVED RAGE.

i see white people. i see amy cooper. i see tiny white children. and i see their entire world unfolding. I think i know how they will turn out. i see their 60-80 years of their lives ahead of them just as i outlined above. and it makes me so, so, so, despondent.

i pour my heart and soul into my work because i chose to, into hoping that the legacy of ethnic studies is not lost. but seeing these white people makes me feel like my work is unraveling - and someone is pulling the string. and the person pulling the string is a white preschooler. 
1 Comment

Consistency.

5/10/2020

1 Comment

 
when kids seem defiant to teachers, i don't really blame them. we grow up with hypocrisy everywhere. Is it like, an american thing to feel lied to constantly? what people say and do like almost never equate? nothing feels real. it kind of just seems like everything is about gaslighting. i'm just thinking a lot of things.

Anyways, let's talk about the inconsistencies and confusions of our lives.

As controversial as it sounds (and yes, I do own this fully), i credit much of my teaching personality to my TFA training. whatever you may believe, i will say this - it is one of the few teaching programs that addresses race and identity in the classroom. it's not to highlight how great tfa is, it just shows you how sad everything is. someone during training told me that consistency was key. i have never forgotten this, and it has helped me see how adults eat bs for breakfast, lunch, dinner.

Level 1 - basic understanding of our teaching inconsistencies:
  • how often is the word "assignment" and "work" used INTERCHANGEABLY?
  • how often are the words "quiet" and "silent" used as if they are the same?
  • how often do we mix up the words "team" and "group" and "partner"?
  • no wonder kids are constantly confused. then they get in trouble for being bad listeners. i'd be an angry kid too (butlikejokesiwasactuallysuchanangrykid).
Ready for Level 2?
  • how often do teachers say that they have a student centered learning environment and their daily slide deck is like, 14 slides?
  • WE TELL KIDS TO BE MORE INDEPENDENT BUT THEY'RE NOT ALLOWED TO SHARPEN A PENCIL WITHOUT PERMISSION.
  • WE TELL KIDS TO BE MORE INDEPENDENT BUT THEY'RE NOT ALLOWED TO ASK FOR HELP FROM THEIR PEERS,  THEY HAVE TO GO TO The teacher/adult/authority figure.
  • HOW OFTEN DO WE DEMAND SILENCE AND THEN TELL PEOPLE TO "USE THEIR VOICE" OR "SPEAK UP WHEN SOMETHING IS WRONG" OR "RAISE YOUR HAND WHEN YOU NEED HELP?"
  • how often do we say we engage in critical thinking when we're using the same articles everyone else is reading in the moment? is that really all it takes to build critical thinking - to reference the same trending articles everyone else is reading?
Level 3 - our actual lives with inconsistencies.
  • we tell a kid to listen to their parents, but one of their parents cheated on the other. (this doesn't always happen, but think of how often we don't really give the disclaimer early on that we are all flawed people!)
  • we tell kids segregation ended in 1956. i have polled my students asking if they believe segregation ended, and about 70% of the class will raise their hands. then I ask why our school's demographics are 99% Latinx. They look around the room. Some students look a little ruined after this. Oh no, segregation is real. (my god, no wonder school feels like BS.)
  • we say slavery ended. 
  • we tell people to speak up, fight for their rights, but then tell people to fight and protest "the right way"
  • we say glass ceilings and race barriers are broken but we celebrate and reinforce tokenism.
  • we say we should love family, but sometimes they are the most problematic. Just ask anyone who has a Chosen family (for those who don't know what a chosen family is, it's an LGBTQ+ thing). 
  • we say education is the way out of poverty. but education has very predictably racially and economically disparate results. 
  • the popular inconsistency: we say affirmative action shouldn't exist but we're totally fine with legacy kids. we say we're not fine with legacy kids but we don't question them verbally/publicly like we do with the racial minorities in college class.
  • we say we want womens' rights but we can't seem to find the "right woman to run for president". people get real defensive about this bullet point. i'm telling you, i will probably not engage. 
  • we say we want income inequality to be solved but somehow are totally fine with saying that teachers deserve a billion dollars. why does anyone need a billion dollars?
  • we simply focus on the wrong people/issues. like, all the time. 
    • minimum wage won't bankrupt us, but those bonuses at the top will. 
    • we think poor people should work harder to get out of poverty but this woman is working 3 jobs!
  • we say we want a better political system but always seem to vote for the white cis male candidate. "they have more experience, after all." 
    • watch how much people cherry-pick issues and candidates every election season. write it down. it is legitimately fascinating.
  • we say we want diversity in the pipeline for jobs - so why is my friend interviewing twice instead of once like everyone else? why do we criticize someone's english ability? why do we say behind closed doors that they didn't go to the "right type of university"? why do we care so much about who they know?
  • we say we have "racially diverse friends", but don't actually go into any in-depth conversations. race is how we want to see it - without the lifelong baggage it has. 
  • we say we care about social justice but have been lowkey stuck in the "reading articles phase" and the "personal development phase" and not the "activism phase" and the "discomforting actions"  and the "it's time i talk to my parents phase". also i want to acknowledge that none of these are actually phases, they all are ongoing at the same time. for the sake of this particular argument, i'm just going to go with it.
  • we tell people to be vulnerable and share stories with one another, but we don't call ourselves out. 
  • we say not to judge, but we judge all the time...
my random one:
  • a lot of articles about meghan markle say she mostly eats vegan, but she seems to eat chicken a lot of the time. can someone help me with this?

Let's go all malcolm gladwell on this for a second. if 10,000 hours makes someone an expert in anything then that means students/kid/young people are professional bs sniffers. they're expert people watchers. they're not just judging adults, they sometimes kind of already know who adults are (and sometimes, more than that adult knows about themselves). They know we're full of sh*t. we don't know it. and then we demand respect. what kind of a screwed up relationship is that? and then we judge people for being in screwed up relationships?

i never said i wasn't a part of these inconsistencies. life is weird, i'm an adult, i have a lot of complexes,  i'm complicated, and i'm full of HYPOCRISIES. i'm not exempt from all this. instead...

i'm just inviting you to think about what you say, what you think you believe, what you tell people, and what advice you give. Are these your actions? do you excuse yourself in anyway? how much do you actually align with yourself?

i know i'm thinking about it. 
1 Comment

Whoa. People actually want some more.

4/15/2020

0 Comments

 
writing my first little bit was so empowering. I didn't realize how much of my identity is tied to my work, how much of my pride and soul comes from talking about race and identity. I mean, I know i love it. i guess i just didn't quite know how much it has defined so much of me over the years. and i want it to define me. i like myself more than i ever did. i like my family more than i ever did.

It's taken up so much space in my brain. in case you were curious, here are the following thoughts i have on repeat:
  1. how did i grow up in the most pan-asian county in the country (at the time) and be so anti-POC/anti-asian american? was i a horrible listener, bad student, or did no adult correct me????
  2. holy wow resources are hard to find. by hard to find, i mean resources that are not scholarly, elitist, theoretical, etc. i'm looking for digestible images, videos, sources that don't feel like i'm excluding someone based on age or ability. ethnic studies stuff is (not?) surprisingly not very accommodating for neurodiverse folks
  3. *epiphany* i have so many ideas. where's my phone so i can put this on my to do list??????????????​
  4. more recent thought since I'm moving: my own understandings and ideas about identity - how many of them are defined by my californian lens?
  5. what can i teach that will be useful, engaging, and not get me in trouble?
  6. am i running out of time to find these things so i can teach it?

lastly, I am surprised with the number of people that went through all 14-ish points. props to you. I feel honored to have had your  attention in that moment.
----

Anyways, i'm writing this because A close friend of mine asked for age-appropriate resources because their son is learning f*cked up things. no surprise. Please keep in mind that this resource below is a huge work in progress, so I will be updating as I go. i'll repost on this blog when i find some good nuggets of information. these are not best practices. these are just what i use because i like them.

Age Appropriate resources gsheet

Thanks to everyone for the support. I'll keep stuff coming your way.
0 Comments

What I've Found to be Best Approaches in Ethnic Studies.

4/7/2020

1 Comment

 
When I was first assigned to be an ethnic studies teacher, i did a summer of research to prepare for what was to come. though i deeply appreciate the hard work people have done to make this class a reality and have shared their resources freely, i thought it was best to create my own curriculum to bring in practical concepts, intersectionality, and move away from the de-politicization of ethnic studies as it has expanded throughout the state. I am not here to say my curriculum is best - i am here to explain my unique approach in teaching this course.

I think it's important to note that my best practices to approach ethnic studies have not entirely been based on scholarly sources or research. However, in my experience there are sources that would validate some of these practices as you'll read below.

-----------------------------------------------------Best Practices-----------------------------------------------------
  1. "Knowledge is power" is a fallacy.
    1. i've seen teachers say that education is change in itself. however if our education system is built upon compliance, then it inherently supports the status quo economically and socially. Therefore, knowledge and education about identity and race is not enough to be change.
    2. according to Dr.  Laurie Santos of Yale University in her course "The Science of Well-Being", she references the GI joe fallacy. this fallacy ultimately states that the idea that knowing is half the battle is false. 
    3. to explain the gi joe fallacy further, she states that knowing doesn't actually have a correlation with doing or changing habits.
  2. Some essay questions are problematic. period. Be reflective on the type of questions you pose. some examples of actual essay prompts I've seen from history teachers:
    1. to what extent were the japanese internment camps justified?
      1. there was well documented PTsd from those who were imprisoned in the camps.
      2. this ultimately set a bad precedent that our country tried to revive in the 2000s towards muslim americans, south asians, and middle eastern folks. 
      3. as someone who worked for a congressman who grew up in the internment camps, he does not talk about these camps positively at all. that should be acknowledged without argument or rebuttal.
    2. to what extent were the building of indian reservations justified?
      1. read about the quality of these reservations and the restrictions of rights on people on their own land. i don't see much of an argument.
      2. check up the historical use of the word indian.
    3. in your opinion, Who is the most admirable historical leader?
      1. your answer will likely be men, or a person with a marginalized identity from a very specific period in time.
  3. be explicit about different types of change.
    1. instead of teaching students to "educate parents" or "talk to friends" or "write a letter to your member of congress", using role play or scenario-based activities in the classroom help students generate their own style on approaching conversations about identity. 
    2. as i have been more explicit about scenarios and situations i myself have been in such as microaggressions, students have been able to notice moments of oppression in livetime because they've had verbal practice and visual cues in the classroom.
    3. i have asked students examples of what it means to stand up for your rights. many cannot state specific examples.  i ask for specific rights. many cannot state specific rights.
  4.  avoid binary thinking.
    1. some questions simply aren't debatable. yes, genocide is bad. yes, racism is bad. arguing otherwise isn't critical thinking, it's promoting DISCRIMINATORY and tone-deaf thinking.
    2. in the tv show "the Newsroom" by aaron sorkin, one of his characters says that there aren't 2 sides to every story. sometimes there's 20, sometimes there's 5, and sometimes there is just one. this monologue in one of his episodes has stuck with me ever since. 
    3. our society promotes either or thinking. there are 2 political parties, 2 sides to an argument, etc. it doesn't have to be this way.
    4. I'd like to call binary thinking as zero sum thinking. this can imply that conflicting truths cannot both be true at the same time. in reality, they can be and this happens frequently. this can also imply that some arguments can be dismissed because i as a student am ultimately choosing one conclusion over another. for example, as a high school student i used to argue that FDR was a ultimately a good president because he created programs for the good of americans, which outweighed the bad such as placing racial restrictions on these programs and incarcerating 120,000 japanese americans. instead of just thinking FDR was good or bad, i argue for a more nuanced answer instead of tallying for arguments on both sides.
    5. ​there are many essay questions I have seen from teachers and from ap courses that promote binary thinking, aka yes/agree/true or no/disagree/false answers. i do not promote binary thinking. examples such as:​
      1. ​does the arc of the moral universe truly bend towards justice?
      2. are americans truly free?
  5. as a solution, i promote spectrum thinking.
    1. i don't even teach racism/non-racism. i teach the racism scale.
    2. i don't even teach the idea of biased/unbiased.
    3. i have asked students to self rate from 1-10 their conscious racial and gender bias. i have also asked students to take a test on their implicit racial and gender bias from Harvard University. the test itself says "slightly leaning" or "strongly leaning" rather than "yes" or "no". 
    4. when i create a problem or a question, i ask students to rate the issue from 1-10. instead of asking whether or not racism is a problem in american society (this has actually been asked by a teacher, and the answer is yes obviously), i would ask a student to rate it from 1-10. How much is racism a problem in american society? Note that i've never actually asked this question - i still personally find it problematic but understand if one uses it for a pre and post assessment.
    5. you could argue that primary sources are inherently racist. 
      1. According to Dr. Jeff DUncan Andrade - because we have historically and currently have disparate results in educational outcomes, language ability, promotion in VARIOUS industries, we would then have to acknowledge that primary sources are
      2. sourced from a small group of people who have a lot of identities and backgrounds in common.
      3. only certain voices have been heard and seen and noticed and validated. if certain groups (let's say women in this case) were not allowed to go to school, then we are missing this viewpoint. 
      4. it is important to note that exceptions are not necessarily a normal/common viewpoint. for example, quoting frederick douglass is considered an exception. he was taught to read and write (not to diminish his pain and oppression) and has a different experience of that time for his identity than someone else. this is the case for all people. also, using one person (in this case, 1 man) as a sole source easily creates exceptionalism. exceptionalism feeds into false hope, false meritocracy, and in my experience student disengagement. lastly, douglass does not speak for the entire black/african american community - that is racial ambassadorship, and that is a form of racism.
      5. to showcase the diversity issue just a little bit and how that leads to a bias in primary sources:
        1. lawmakers are majority white on all levels of government.
        2. ~80% of the nation's teachers are white.
        3. the least amount of racial diversity and lowest turnover in the teaching profession are history teachers.
        4. ~75% of all journalists/news network staff are white.
        5. ~90% of film award winners are white.
        6. note that #1-5 are people historically viewed as primary source generators.
        7. Time freezing: example - films about the black/african american community are primarily about one time period. think of all marginalized communities that are essentially "frozen" in a time period whenever showcased in any form. 
        8. tech companies/the tech industry is majority white, east/south asian american, cis, and male. this would imply that algorithms created from nondiverse staff would then mean implicit biases are generated and generate revenue and spit out implicitly biased information.
  6. find specific laws, and find the quantity of laws.​
    1. In my class, I will showcase 200+ jim crow laws. students will start to remark in ways such as,
      1. "wow, they really couldn't do anything back then."
      2. "if blacks were getting fined so often back then, does that relate to how so many people of color are poor today?"
      3. "is this when the school to prison pipeline really started?"
    2. in 1 teaching observation, a teacher showed five lines of jim crow laws in regards to housing. this again demonstrates the limited depth and frequency of this type of oppression. 
    3. i am a big proponent of teachers teaching just how awful things were in history. for example, kids will often recite to me that jim crow laws affected people in places like water fountain areas, schools, and bathrooms. This demonstrates the limited amount and depth of oppression explored in classroom.
  7. when thinking about a historical event, be sure to think about the aftermath/consequences/feelings of the marginalized. if you can, combine historical concepts of the time. when i taught international baccalaureate history HL, i made a few examples:
    1. in my experience, i have gotten students emotional though not intentionally. hiding the collective pain and trauma means that today we are likely to dismiss people who are not like us.
    2. although i personally don't agree with any wars we have fought, those who fought in the war as a person of color (remember women could not fight) were not allowed to be formally recognized with medals for a time. think about how it feels to not be qualified to do/be awarded. 
    3. when japanese americans returned from the camps, their homes were taken (occupied by many jewish and latinx folks) and they were homeless. they lost income for many years. many became sharecroppers.
    4. during the push for the 19th amendment, think about how it would feel to be a latinx woman of the time being verbally dismissed by a white woman. how many women became homeless. remember that most people believed in eugenics, so not only were people dissing people of color, but they thought they were dumb as rocks and used "science" to prove this.
  8. use a variety of sources.
    1. think of which sources do represent a community.
      1. if you overuse sandra cisneros as the sole storyteller of that racial community, students will disengage easily. it's like beating a dead horse (speciesist, i know)
      2. Battle Hymn of the tiger mother by amy chua is a source that has been used in an ethnic studies class. i will tell you, she does not represent the AANHPI community. many AANHPI folks would agree with me.
    2. historical vs. contemporary sources: similar to #2, but really reflect on what historical and contemporary means to you besides just that time period.
    3. primary vs. secondary sources - having a balance of both, not only primary. please note that this is heavily discouraged in the history teacher communities from my experience.
    4. instead of simply assessing the different mediums you will provide as a history teacher (political cartoons, news articles, etc.), be sure to assess different forms of diversity within your teaching materials.
  9. where does your bias lie?
    1. for example, in my case:
      1. being an asian american teaching non-asian american students means i care about intersectionality a lot.
      2. i come from immigrant parents - every time i critique the "system", i feel a rush of fear. there's an element of conservatism/lack of risk taking that dominates much of what i do and how i do it. i acknowledge it is hard for me to connect to people who are on the "front lines" because i am working on having that courage.
      3. as a kid growing up in cupertino during a period of white flight, major news networks such as the wall street journal essentially blamed asian americans for "scaring away white students" due to competition and for increasing teen suicide in the area. i have a lot of unresolved feelings about white-identified folks.
    2. we all have biases due to our identities. it is okay (to some degree). it is our need to be reflective to notice what we like and what we need to work on.
  10. CAN YOU FIND SOLIDARITY?
    1. THERE ARE FEW BUT IMPORTANT SOLIDARITY MOVEMENTS IN HISTORY. AS AN ASIAN AMERICAN WOMAN WHO TEACHES MAJORITY LATINX AND BLACK STUDENTS, I HAVE FOUND THIS TO BE A USEFUL TOOL TO BREAK DOWN SEGREGATION AND RACIAL HOSTILITY. THIS HAS HELPED ME BUILD CULTURE AND CONNECTION IN THE CLASSROOM. IF YOU DON'T KNOW OF ANY SOLIDARITY MOVEMENTS, CONTACT ME AND I CAN POINT YOU IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.
    2. FOR EXAMPLE, MOST STUDENTS WILL REMARK THAT THEY DID NOT KNOW THAT THE RED POWER MOVEMENT, CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT, LABOR MOVEMENT, CHICANX MOVEMENT AND ASIAN AMERICAN MOVEMENT ALL HAPPENED IN THE SAME ~15 YEARS. THIS MEANS A BIAS WAS CREATED - ONLY CERTAIN RACES WERE "SMART ENOUGH" TO STAND UP FOR THEIR RIGHTS. THIS WILL EFFECTIVELY DISEMPOWER CERTAIN IDENTITIES AND RACIAL COMMUNITIES BECAUSE THEY DO NOT KNOW THEY COME FROM FIGHTERS AND POWERFUL PEOPLE.
    3. OUR COUNTRY AND SOCIETY WILL CONTINUE TO BELIEVE IT'S A "BLACK PEOPLE PROBLEM" OR A "NATIVE AMERICAN PROBLEM" BECAUSE WE POSE PUBLIC POLICY PROBLEMS, SOLUTIONS, AND HISTORY BASED ON THIS. 
  11. Fact check your stuff.
    1. "Equal Rights For Others Does Not Mean Less Rights For You. It's Not Pie."
    2. ​affirmative action does not actually take away college spots from asian americans. i saw the model minority (not the modely minority myth, mind you) narrative taught in a class once!
1 Comment

    Archives

    February 2024
    September 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
    • Official Bio
    • Blog, aka Ramblings
  • Services
  • Portfolio
    • Projects
    • Class Observations
  • Let's Talk