I took the liberty of looking at the 2019 AP US History exam. Here are the time periods I recorded that students had to write about in this exam:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the skeptics, why don't we break this down. note the percentages in black. 1980s-present is 4-6% of the curriculum. I REMEMBER SPENDING A MINIMUM 4 MONTHS STUDYING THE ERAS FROM 1491 (ALSO WEIRD YEAR TO FLEX, COLUMBUS NEVER SET FOOT ON "AMERICAN SOIL") TO 1848. 2 MONTHS IN SUMMER, 2 MONTHS IN THE SCHOOL YEAR. THAT IS 1/5TH OF THE SCHOOL YEAR.
regular US history teachers aren't better. usually teachers have to teach more than 1 class - so the US history teacher and the AP US History teacher are the same person. as a coping mechanism (because the job is pretty much an impossible job), that teachers will teach regular US history similarly to APUSH, not the other way around. You have your reputation on the line, after all (shoutout to pass rates). One additional thing: There's also a recurring feedback loop - the easiest units to teach are the ones with more resources, the units with more resources are the Revolution, Civil War, WW2, aka anything pre-1970s, and the cycle continues. This is all to say that I think this idea that "we will teach this in history and we will be appalled" is still wishful thinking. Demand that the tests change. Reallocate those percentages. Demand that the curriculum and standards change. Demand that course offerings change.
1 Comment
Some thoughts about the amy cooper/Christian cooper incident: yes. everything about this makes me mad. many people talked about it - white fragility, white women and the need to own up to their own racism, bad/lack of actual apologies, lack of justice, lack of clarity on what happens moving forward, etc. I collected a lot of articles/opinions about it. i love that there are so many nuanced voices coming forth. this is what also makes me mad: nothing is going to happen to amy cooper's mentality. white people who have been burned like her don't necessarily change their mind. actually, it's pretty unlikely.
post incident - Did amy donate to BLM? Did amy go enroll in a community college to take a sociology class? did amy go and actively examine that she's only friends with a particular set of race(s) and gender(s)? anyways, a month ago i saw a photo of preschoolers from a school somewhere in west LA county. it was just a photo of smiling preschoolers. that's it. the preschoolers obviously didn't do anything to me. but seeing them triggered me, infuriated me, and i was deeply moody for days. I thought about these kids (that i don't know, mind you!), and i was just simply fuming and obsessing.over and over again. my friend (thanks, zack!) helped me realize this - i know why looking at photos of white people make me so upset: based on my research, life experiences, and statistics known, I think i know exactly how they are going to turn out. Sure, sure. not all white people are like this. but that's not the point of this post. Try this story out. I will produce the following assumptions in a story below:
i see white people. i see amy cooper. i see tiny white children. and i see their entire world unfolding. I think i know how they will turn out. i see their 60-80 years of their lives ahead of them just as i outlined above. and it makes me so, so, so, despondent. i pour my heart and soul into my work because i chose to, into hoping that the legacy of ethnic studies is not lost. but seeing these white people makes me feel like my work is unraveling - and someone is pulling the string. and the person pulling the string is a white preschooler. |
Archives
February 2024
Categories |